<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1144 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797270</link>
    <description>Admission of a corporate insolvency resolution process application was not vitiated by reliance on photocopies where an undisputed information utility record established default. Section 7 permits default to be ascertained from an information utility record or other evidence furnished by the financial creditor. The corporate debtor&#039;s loan availing and pleaded default date were also established, with the default recorded as conceded before the adjudicating authority. Any challenge to the accuracy of that factual recording required prior correction of the adjudicating authority&#039;s order. The admission order was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1144 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797270</link>
      <description>Admission of a corporate insolvency resolution process application was not vitiated by reliance on photocopies where an undisputed information utility record established default. Section 7 permits default to be ascertained from an information utility record or other evidence furnished by the financial creditor. The corporate debtor&#039;s loan availing and pleaded default date were also established, with the default recorded as conceded before the adjudicating authority. Any challenge to the accuracy of that factual recording required prior correction of the adjudicating authority&#039;s order. The admission order was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>