<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 240 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53321</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai reduced the penalty on the firm and partner while upholding the duty demand, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeals. The ROM application was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 240 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53321</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai reduced the penalty on the firm and partner while upholding the duty demand, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeals. The ROM application was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>