<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797283</link>
    <description>Revocation of a Customs Broker licence for alleged breaches of obligations relating to export shipments was set aside because the allegations had already been found unsustainable in an identical matter involving the same exporter. No material factual distinction was established, and the earlier Tribunal decision had been accepted without challenge. Consequently, no substantial question of law arose, leaving the setting aside of licence revocation undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797283</link>
      <description>Revocation of a Customs Broker licence for alleged breaches of obligations relating to export shipments was set aside because the allegations had already been found unsustainable in an identical matter involving the same exporter. No material factual distinction was established, and the earlier Tribunal decision had been accepted without challenge. Consequently, no substantial question of law arose, leaving the setting aside of licence revocation undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>