<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1169 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797295</link>
    <description>Reassessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 was time-barred because the first proviso to Section 149(1) preserves the pre-amendment limitation restriction for years up to Assessment Year 2021-22. The applicable six-year period expired on 31 March 2022. The fifth and sixth provisos, excluding time allowed or extended for a response under Section 148A(b), operate within the amended three-year and ten-year framework and do not enlarge the first-proviso restriction. As no extension to respond under Section 148A(b) was sought, the subsequent Section 148 notice was beyond limitation. A non-speaking special leave petition dismissal does not confirm lower-court reasoning or trigger merger.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1169 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797295</link>
      <description>Reassessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 was time-barred because the first proviso to Section 149(1) preserves the pre-amendment limitation restriction for years up to Assessment Year 2021-22. The applicable six-year period expired on 31 March 2022. The fifth and sixth provisos, excluding time allowed or extended for a response under Section 148A(b), operate within the amended three-year and ten-year framework and do not enlarge the first-proviso restriction. As no extension to respond under Section 148A(b) was sought, the subsequent Section 148 notice was beyond limitation. A non-speaking special leave petition dismissal does not confirm lower-court reasoning or trigger merger.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>