<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1177 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797303</link>
    <description>Faceless reassessment jurisdiction under Sections 147 and 144B extended to the National Faceless Assessment Centre before Notification No. 18/2022 where binding CBDT directions under Section 119 required it to complete reassessments, subject to specified exclusions. The later Section 151A notification did not invalidate reassessments completed under the earlier faceless-assessment framework. Additions for cash payments and rent income made in an ex parte assessment required fresh appellate adjudication because the assessee&#039;s continuing mental illness prevented effective participation. The first appellate authority must provide three effective opportunities to furnish supporting material before deciding those additions on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1177 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797303</link>
      <description>Faceless reassessment jurisdiction under Sections 147 and 144B extended to the National Faceless Assessment Centre before Notification No. 18/2022 where binding CBDT directions under Section 119 required it to complete reassessments, subject to specified exclusions. The later Section 151A notification did not invalidate reassessments completed under the earlier faceless-assessment framework. Additions for cash payments and rent income made in an ex parte assessment required fresh appellate adjudication because the assessee&#039;s continuing mental illness prevented effective participation. The first appellate authority must provide three effective opportunities to furnish supporting material before deciding those additions on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>