<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1181 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797307</link>
    <description>Interest disallowances relating to unsecured loans required fresh adjudication because substantially similar issues for the preceding assessment year had been restored for de novo consideration. The outcome for that preceding year was material to determination for the relevant year. No view was taken on the merits, and the appellate authority was required to reconsider the matter after providing adequate hearing opportunity, together with the connected preceding-year proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1181 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797307</link>
      <description>Interest disallowances relating to unsecured loans required fresh adjudication because substantially similar issues for the preceding assessment year had been restored for de novo consideration. The outcome for that preceding year was material to determination for the relevant year. No view was taken on the merits, and the appellate authority was required to reconsider the matter after providing adequate hearing opportunity, together with the connected preceding-year proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>