<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1186 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797312</link>
    <description>Reassessment based on an audit objection requires objective material showing that identified disclosed credits are non-genuine; suspicion arising from alleged non-verification of sundry creditors is insufficient. Cash payments for purchases of raw hides and skins are permitted under section 40A(3) read with Rule 6DD(e)(ii). Where books record sellers&#039; or creditors&#039; names and relevant mandi details, and no material casts doubt on those particulars or the sellers&#039; existence, failure to provide PAN or addresses cannot support an adverse inference absent a legal requirement to maintain them. Reopening on these facts lacks jurisdiction and amounts to an impermissible fishing enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1186 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797312</link>
      <description>Reassessment based on an audit objection requires objective material showing that identified disclosed credits are non-genuine; suspicion arising from alleged non-verification of sundry creditors is insufficient. Cash payments for purchases of raw hides and skins are permitted under section 40A(3) read with Rule 6DD(e)(ii). Where books record sellers&#039; or creditors&#039; names and relevant mandi details, and no material casts doubt on those particulars or the sellers&#039; existence, failure to provide PAN or addresses cannot support an adverse inference absent a legal requirement to maintain them. Reopening on these facts lacks jurisdiction and amounts to an impermissible fishing enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>