<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 290 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53317</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of the appellants regarding denial of Modvat credit and imposition of penalty. The Tribunal found that the appellants had not claimed depreciation in their revised Income-tax return, so they cannot be denied Modvat credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:01:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 290 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53317</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of the appellants regarding denial of Modvat credit and imposition of penalty. The Tribunal found that the appellants had not claimed depreciation in their revised Income-tax return, so they cannot be denied Modvat credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>