<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1195 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797321</link>
    <description>Section 153C requires the satisfaction note and consequential notice to be issued immediately after the searched person&#039;s assessment proceedings. A ten-month interval between completion of those proceedings and issuance of the satisfaction notes and notices was not a reasonable time. On identical facts involving the same assessee for other assessment years, the binding determination governed the position. The delayed Section 153C notices were therefore time-barred and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1195 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797321</link>
      <description>Section 153C requires the satisfaction note and consequential notice to be issued immediately after the searched person&#039;s assessment proceedings. A ten-month interval between completion of those proceedings and issuance of the satisfaction notes and notices was not a reasonable time. On identical facts involving the same assessee for other assessment years, the binding determination governed the position. The delayed Section 153C notices were therefore time-barred and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>