<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1200 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797326</link>
    <description>Section 107 of the GST law prescribes a three-month period for filing an appeal, with a further one-month period permitted for delayed presentation. Although the statutory appeal was filed beyond both periods, the claimed provision of exempt services required factual adjudication. The appeal was restored for adjudication in accordance with law, with all merits contentions remaining open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1200 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797326</link>
      <description>Section 107 of the GST law prescribes a three-month period for filing an appeal, with a further one-month period permitted for delayed presentation. Although the statutory appeal was filed beyond both periods, the claimed provision of exempt services required factual adjudication. The appeal was restored for adjudication in accordance with law, with all merits contentions remaining open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>