<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 191 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53316</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for the period 1-1-1994 to 17-5-1994 as time-barred and affirmed the sanction of the refund for the period 18-5-1994 to 12-10-1994, subject to the adjustment of Modvat credit as per the previous order. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the strict application of the limitation provisions under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 191 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53316</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for the period 1-1-1994 to 17-5-1994 as time-barred and affirmed the sanction of the refund for the period 18-5-1994 to 12-10-1994, subject to the adjustment of Modvat credit as per the previous order. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the strict application of the limitation provisions under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>