<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasoned adjudication of reassessment jurisdictional objections must precede merits review where foundational defects may invalidate the reassessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102876</link>
    <description>Jurisdictional objections in reassessment, including a notice issued in the name of a deceased assessee and alleged procedural non-compliance, must be addressed before merits where they could invalidate the reassessment. Section 250(6) requires the appellate authority to identify each point for determination, record its decision and provide reasons; a general reference to the assessment order does not constitute ground-wise reasoned adjudication. The authority&#039;s power to set aside a best-judgment assessment does not remove this obligation. Jurisdictional and legal grounds should be decided through a speaking order before additions are examined on merits, which arise only if the reassessment is valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reasoned adjudication of reassessment jurisdictional objections must precede merits review where foundational defects may invalidate the reassessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102876</link>
      <description>Jurisdictional objections in reassessment, including a notice issued in the name of a deceased assessee and alleged procedural non-compliance, must be addressed before merits where they could invalidate the reassessment. Section 250(6) requires the appellate authority to identify each point for determination, record its decision and provide reasons; a general reference to the assessment order does not constitute ground-wise reasoned adjudication. The authority&#039;s power to set aside a best-judgment assessment does not remove this obligation. Jurisdictional and legal grounds should be decided through a speaking order before additions are examined on merits, which arise only if the reassessment is valid.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>