<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Personal insolvency moratorium does not halt directors&#039; cheque-dishonour trials where liability arises vicariously from the company&#039;s debt.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102850</link>
    <description>Personal insolvency interim moratorium does not stay cheque-dishonour prosecutions against company directors and responsible persons where the dishonoured cheques represent the company&#039;s debt. Directors are prosecuted through statutory vicarious liability rather than as primary personal debtors, while the moratorium applies to civil debt-recovery actions concerning the individual debtor and does not bar criminal proceedings. Potential recovery of compensation does not justify staying the trial at that stage. A pending reference to a larger Bench does not weaken the binding effect of existing law unless altered; therefore, trials need not await determination of questions concerning compensation. Applications and writ petitions seeking to stay or defer the prosecutions were dismissed, and interim stays were vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Personal insolvency moratorium does not halt directors&#039; cheque-dishonour trials where liability arises vicariously from the company&#039;s debt.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102850</link>
      <description>Personal insolvency interim moratorium does not stay cheque-dishonour prosecutions against company directors and responsible persons where the dishonoured cheques represent the company&#039;s debt. Directors are prosecuted through statutory vicarious liability rather than as primary personal debtors, while the moratorium applies to civil debt-recovery actions concerning the individual debtor and does not bar criminal proceedings. Potential recovery of compensation does not justify staying the trial at that stage. A pending reference to a larger Bench does not weaken the binding effect of existing law unless altered; therefore, trials need not await determination of questions concerning compensation. Applications and writ petitions seeking to stay or defer the prosecutions were dismissed, and interim stays were vacated.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:14:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>