<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1853 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471061</link>
    <description>Compassionate-appointment applications arising from an employee&#039;s death before the 2020 Rehabilitation Assistance Rules commenced must be assessed under the rules in force on the date of death where the application was timely under the 1990 Rules. Administrative delay in processing a pending application cannot subject the applicant to the later regime. Substituted Rule 6(9), introduced by the 2025 Amendment Rules, expressly preserves the earlier rules for pending claims concerning pre-2020 deaths. The prior judicial declaration regarding the former Rule 6(9) continues to operate absent a stay. Accordingly, the application must be considered under the 1990 Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1853 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471061</link>
      <description>Compassionate-appointment applications arising from an employee&#039;s death before the 2020 Rehabilitation Assistance Rules commenced must be assessed under the rules in force on the date of death where the application was timely under the 1990 Rules. Administrative delay in processing a pending application cannot subject the applicant to the later regime. Substituted Rule 6(9), introduced by the 2025 Amendment Rules, expressly preserves the earlier rules for pending claims concerning pre-2020 deaths. The prior judicial declaration regarding the former Rule 6(9) continues to operate absent a stay. Accordingly, the application must be considered under the 1990 Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>