<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1862 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471067</link>
    <description>Counsel-related communication failure, supported by affidavit and untainted by deliberate delay, constituted sufficient cause for condoning a 285-day delay in filing an appeal. An ex parte appellate decision made when the assessee lacked representation required fresh adjudication to ensure a meaningful opportunity to submit factual material and explanations. The additions and disallowance remained open for independent determination on merits, and the matter was restored for fresh appellate consideration after due hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1862 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471067</link>
      <description>Counsel-related communication failure, supported by affidavit and untainted by deliberate delay, constituted sufficient cause for condoning a 285-day delay in filing an appeal. An ex parte appellate decision made when the assessee lacked representation required fresh adjudication to ensure a meaningful opportunity to submit factual material and explanations. The additions and disallowance remained open for independent determination on merits, and the matter was restored for fresh appellate consideration after due hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>