<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalty and confiscation orders in a case involving misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, where expert opinion confirmed the goods as unserviceable scrap. The judgment emphasized the irrelevance of legal precedents cited by the Revenue, leading to the allowance of appeals and consequential relief for the appellants due to the absence of misdeclaration. The decision hinged on the expert examination, which determined the nature of the goods and influenced the outcome in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:26:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalty and confiscation orders in a case involving misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, where expert opinion confirmed the goods as unserviceable scrap. The judgment emphasized the irrelevance of legal precedents cited by the Revenue, leading to the allowance of appeals and consequential relief for the appellants due to the absence of misdeclaration. The decision hinged on the expert examination, which determined the nature of the goods and influenced the outcome in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>