<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 804 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471056</link>
    <description>Limitation rules promote public policy and prevent dilatory conduct, but should not defeat substantial justice where delay is bona fide and adequately explained. Belated receipt of a certified copy, obtaining legal opinion, and sanctioning substantial court fees explained the delay in filing a land-acquisition appeal. Negligence by government counsel and officials did not establish callousness or absence of bona fides, and public interest should not suffer because of that lapse. A pragmatic approach, particularly where arguable merits exist, supports condonation subject to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 804 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471056</link>
      <description>Limitation rules promote public policy and prevent dilatory conduct, but should not defeat substantial justice where delay is bona fide and adequately explained. Belated receipt of a certified copy, obtaining legal opinion, and sanctioning substantial court fees explained the delay in filing a land-acquisition appeal. Negligence by government counsel and officials did not establish callousness or absence of bona fides, and public interest should not suffer because of that lapse. A pragmatic approach, particularly where arguable merits exist, supports condonation subject to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>