<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1076 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797202</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment of property held by a company not accused of money laundering requires material showing that proceeds of crime were transferred to the company and used for acquisition, or that the asset is validly identifiable as equivalent-value property of a person involved in money laundering. Property acquired through a bank auction using documented loan funds and the company&#039;s own savings cannot be treated as proceeds of crime without a demonstrated money trail. Alleged control by the principal accused, based mainly on unsupported witness statements, does not establish the accused&#039;s title, use of layered proceeds, or an equivalent-value basis for attachment. The attachment was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1076 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797202</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment of property held by a company not accused of money laundering requires material showing that proceeds of crime were transferred to the company and used for acquisition, or that the asset is validly identifiable as equivalent-value property of a person involved in money laundering. Property acquired through a bank auction using documented loan funds and the company&#039;s own savings cannot be treated as proceeds of crime without a demonstrated money trail. Alleged control by the principal accused, based mainly on unsupported witness statements, does not establish the accused&#039;s title, use of layered proceeds, or an equivalent-value basis for attachment. The attachment was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>