<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1080 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797206</link>
    <description>Section 100(4) gives requisitioning members an additional, alternative right to call and hold an extraordinary general meeting if the Board fails to act on a valid requisition; it need not be exhausted before seeking relief under Section 98. Section 98 independently permits the Tribunal to direct a meeting only where convening or conducting it through ordinary mechanisms is reasonably impracticable. This exceptional jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly and requires concrete factual proof, not merely director disagreement or rejection of a requisition by a Board majority. In the absence of foundational evidence that shareholders could not convene the meeting, intervention under Section 98 is unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1080 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797206</link>
      <description>Section 100(4) gives requisitioning members an additional, alternative right to call and hold an extraordinary general meeting if the Board fails to act on a valid requisition; it need not be exhausted before seeking relief under Section 98. Section 98 independently permits the Tribunal to direct a meeting only where convening or conducting it through ordinary mechanisms is reasonably impracticable. This exceptional jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly and requires concrete factual proof, not merely director disagreement or rejection of a requisition by a Board majority. In the absence of foundational evidence that shareholders could not convene the meeting, intervention under Section 98 is unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>