<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1096 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797222</link>
    <description>Transfer-pricing comparability for software development services may apply an upper turnover filter of ten times the tested party&#039;s turnover. Material scale differences can affect the functions, assets and risks profile because significantly larger companies may benefit from economies of scale, stronger market position, valuable intangibles and diversified operations. Consistency with an earlier-year determination supports retaining the filter where facts and law remain unchanged. Companies exceeding the ten-times threshold should be excluded from the comparable set, and the arm&#039;s length price should be recomputed after allowing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1096 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797222</link>
      <description>Transfer-pricing comparability for software development services may apply an upper turnover filter of ten times the tested party&#039;s turnover. Material scale differences can affect the functions, assets and risks profile because significantly larger companies may benefit from economies of scale, stronger market position, valuable intangibles and diversified operations. Consistency with an earlier-year determination supports retaining the filter where facts and law remain unchanged. Companies exceeding the ten-times threshold should be excluded from the comparable set, and the arm&#039;s length price should be recomputed after allowing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>