<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1098 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797224</link>
    <description>Addition based on an alleged fall in net profit rate was unsustainable because the assessment incorrectly treated the declared rate as 0.35% instead of the audited net profit rate of 46.99%. The audited financial results showed increased profitability compared with the preceding year, making the comparison underlying the addition factually incorrect. The addition founded on the erroneous net profit-rate comparison was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1098 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797224</link>
      <description>Addition based on an alleged fall in net profit rate was unsustainable because the assessment incorrectly treated the declared rate as 0.35% instead of the audited net profit rate of 46.99%. The audited financial results showed increased profitability compared with the preceding year, making the comparison underlying the addition factually incorrect. The addition founded on the erroneous net profit-rate comparison was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>