<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1116 - GSTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797242</link>
    <description>Rule 43&#039;s 2022 amendment excluding duty credit scrip values from exempt supplies is presented as prospective from 5 July 2022, not applicable to transactions during 2017-20. The amendment is characterised as creating a new benefit in calculating proportionate input tax credit reversal rather than clarifying an existing ambiguity; input tax credit is treated as concessional and not retrospectively vested. The monetary-limit circular is described as binding departmental officers but not the Tribunal, with aggregate tax involved in a composite order and recurring interpretive issues requiring consideration. Section 74(1) requires proof of fraud, wilful misstatement, or deliberate suppression intended to evade tax; absent such material, liability should be determined under Section 75(2) using the Section 73(1) mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1116 - GSTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797242</link>
      <description>Rule 43&#039;s 2022 amendment excluding duty credit scrip values from exempt supplies is presented as prospective from 5 July 2022, not applicable to transactions during 2017-20. The amendment is characterised as creating a new benefit in calculating proportionate input tax credit reversal rather than clarifying an existing ambiguity; input tax credit is treated as concessional and not retrospectively vested. The monetary-limit circular is described as binding departmental officers but not the Tribunal, with aggregate tax involved in a composite order and recurring interpretive issues requiring consideration. Section 74(1) requires proof of fraud, wilful misstatement, or deliberate suppression intended to evade tax; absent such material, liability should be determined under Section 75(2) using the Section 73(1) mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>