<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 212 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially upheld the impugned order, confirming the duty demand on short found goods and inputs while setting aside the demand related to clandestine manufacture due to insufficient evidence. The denial of Cenvat credit on rejected goods was overturned, as proper procedures were followed. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 212 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially upheld the impugned order, confirming the duty demand on short found goods and inputs while setting aside the demand related to clandestine manufacture due to insufficient evidence. The denial of Cenvat credit on rejected goods was overturned, as proper procedures were followed. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>