<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Special Additional Duty refund limitation cannot curtail substantive refund rights through subordinate legislation without statutory authority.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102821</link>
    <description>Special Additional Duty refund limitation under an amending customs exemption notification is addressed in relation to a claim rejected solely for filing beyond one year. The limitation was treated as requiring read-down because subordinate legislation could not impose a time bar affecting substantive refund rights without applying a statutory limitation under the parent enactment. A contrary High Court view was noted, but the refund claim was treated as covered by the decisions supporting read-down. The time-bar rejection was set aside, with consequential relief in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Special Additional Duty refund limitation cannot curtail substantive refund rights through subordinate legislation without statutory authority.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102821</link>
      <description>Special Additional Duty refund limitation under an amending customs exemption notification is addressed in relation to a claim rejected solely for filing beyond one year. The limitation was treated as requiring read-down because subordinate legislation could not impose a time bar affecting substantive refund rights without applying a statutory limitation under the parent enactment. A contrary High Court view was noted, but the refund claim was treated as covered by the decisions supporting read-down. The time-bar rejection was set aside, with consequential relief in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>