<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471026</link>
    <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to a life insurance company because its income is computed under the special regime governing insurance businesses. Consistent coordinate-bench decisions in the taxpayer&#039;s earlier assessment years had applied this principle, and no contrary decision was identified. The resulting effect is that expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income is inapplicable to a life insurance company, and the disallowance is deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471026</link>
      <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to a life insurance company because its income is computed under the special regime governing insurance businesses. Consistent coordinate-bench decisions in the taxpayer&#039;s earlier assessment years had applied this principle, and no contrary decision was identified. The resulting effect is that expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income is inapplicable to a life insurance company, and the disallowance is deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>