<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2305 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471032</link>
    <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period cannot be treated wholly as unexplained money under Section 69A where records support their source as business receipts. Deposits in the same bank account had been accepted as business-sourced outside the demonetisation period, while VAT returns and a business licence substantiated the existence and turnover of a proprietary seeds and fertilisers business. As no income-tax return had been filed, taxable income from the disclosed turnover was determined under the presumptive taxation framework in Section 44AD at 8% of turnover. The addition was consequently restricted to estimated net profit rather than the full deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2305 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471032</link>
      <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period cannot be treated wholly as unexplained money under Section 69A where records support their source as business receipts. Deposits in the same bank account had been accepted as business-sourced outside the demonetisation period, while VAT returns and a business licence substantiated the existence and turnover of a proprietary seeds and fertilisers business. As no income-tax return had been filed, taxable income from the disclosed turnover was determined under the presumptive taxation framework in Section 44AD at 8% of turnover. The addition was consequently restricted to estimated net profit rather than the full deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>