<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1859 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471041</link>
    <description>Cash deposits were treated as satisfactorily explained where cash-flow statements, bank summaries and passbook entries established sufficient opening cash balances and cash receipts for each relevant assessment year. In the absence of material discrediting the stated sources or showing concealment, the deposits could not be characterised as unexplained money. The proposed addition was therefore not sustainable, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1859 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471041</link>
      <description>Cash deposits were treated as satisfactorily explained where cash-flow statements, bank summaries and passbook entries established sufficient opening cash balances and cash receipts for each relevant assessment year. In the absence of material discrediting the stated sources or showing concealment, the deposits could not be characterised as unexplained money. The proposed addition was therefore not sustainable, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>