<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1860 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471042</link>
    <description>Interest disallowance based on alleged non-genuine loans was premature because the question whether the principal loans were accommodation entries remained pending for the years in which those loans were obtained. Unclaimed interest expenditure was permitted to be set off against the interest disallowed on those loans. Consequently, the interest disallowance was restricted after allowing the set-off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1860 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471042</link>
      <description>Interest disallowance based on alleged non-genuine loans was premature because the question whether the principal loans were accommodation entries remained pending for the years in which those loans were obtained. Unclaimed interest expenditure was permitted to be set off against the interest disallowed on those loans. Consequently, the interest disallowance was restricted after allowing the set-off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>