<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1408 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471023</link>
    <description>Outstanding trade creditors arising from material supplies and purchases, supported by bills and unrebutted reconciliations, are not unexplained cash credits merely because of discrepancies in creditors&#039; accounts; the Section 68 addition was therefore deleted. Genuine purchases do not by themselves prevent disallowance where statutory restrictions on cash payments apply, so the cash-payment disallowance was restored. Relief from the peak-capital addition remained justified because audited books showed regular business deposits and withdrawals supported by available funds, although a limited residual addition was retained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1408 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471023</link>
      <description>Outstanding trade creditors arising from material supplies and purchases, supported by bills and unrebutted reconciliations, are not unexplained cash credits merely because of discrepancies in creditors&#039; accounts; the Section 68 addition was therefore deleted. Genuine purchases do not by themselves prevent disallowance where statutory restrictions on cash payments apply, so the cash-payment disallowance was restored. Relief from the peak-capital addition remained justified because audited books showed regular business deposits and withdrawals supported by available funds, although a limited residual addition was retained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>