<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1643 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471010</link>
    <description>Special Bench order adverse to the assessee could not stand because it reaffirmed an earlier view that had been set aside by the controlling High Court decision. The governing precedent displaced the basis for the Special Bench&#039;s reasoning, requiring reconsideration in conformity with that decision. The impugned order was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh determination on the applicable legal position, with the assessee succeeding on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1643 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471010</link>
      <description>Special Bench order adverse to the assessee could not stand because it reaffirmed an earlier view that had been set aside by the controlling High Court decision. The governing precedent displaced the basis for the Special Bench&#039;s reasoning, requiring reconsideration in conformity with that decision. The impugned order was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh determination on the applicable legal position, with the assessee succeeding on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>