<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 993 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797119</link>
    <description>SARFAESI challenges to bank-recovery measures should ordinarily be pursued through the efficacious statutory remedy before the competent forum. Writ jurisdiction should not bypass the specialised legislative mechanism, particularly where disputed factual questions may arise. A direct writ challenge to SARFAESI proceedings is therefore not maintainable when an effective alternative statutory remedy is available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 993 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797119</link>
      <description>SARFAESI challenges to bank-recovery measures should ordinarily be pursued through the efficacious statutory remedy before the competent forum. Writ jurisdiction should not bypass the specialised legislative mechanism, particularly where disputed factual questions may arise. A direct writ challenge to SARFAESI proceedings is therefore not maintainable when an effective alternative statutory remedy is available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>