<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 997 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797123</link>
    <description>Adjournments cannot be granted beyond the statutory maximum of three where repeated requests are made without adequate justification. Continued absence and mechanical adjournment requests led to dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution. The statutory limit restricts further postponement after three adjournments, requiring parties to prosecute matters diligently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 997 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797123</link>
      <description>Adjournments cannot be granted beyond the statutory maximum of three where repeated requests are made without adequate justification. Continued absence and mechanical adjournment requests led to dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution. The statutory limit restricts further postponement after three adjournments, requiring parties to prosecute matters diligently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>