<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1003 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797129</link>
    <description>PMLA bail requirements under the twin conditions in section 45, the definition of proceeds of crime, the presumption under section 24(b), the need for a predicate offence before PMLA proceedings, prima facie assessment on broad probabilities at the bail stage, and disclosure under section 66 are identified as the principal issues. Delay was condoned, notice was issued, and dasti service was permitted. No determination of the substantive PMLA issues is recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1003 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797129</link>
      <description>PMLA bail requirements under the twin conditions in section 45, the definition of proceeds of crime, the presumption under section 24(b), the need for a predicate offence before PMLA proceedings, prima facie assessment on broad probabilities at the bail stage, and disclosure under section 66 are identified as the principal issues. Delay was condoned, notice was issued, and dasti service was permitted. No determination of the substantive PMLA issues is recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>