<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1004 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797130</link>
    <description>Front-running allegations involving use of non-public information to trade ahead of large mutual-fund orders fall within the regulatory framework for fraudulent or unfair trade practices under securities law. The statutory bar on cognizance requires prosecution for offences under that framework to proceed on a complaint by SEBI, and the special mechanism prevails over general criminal-law process. An FIR founded essentially on the securities-law violation cannot bypass that requirement and was quashed in its existing form. Any criminal action for the alleged front-running offence must be initiated through SEBI&#039;s prescribed statutory procedure. Whether the facts disclose an independent general criminal-law offence remained undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1004 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797130</link>
      <description>Front-running allegations involving use of non-public information to trade ahead of large mutual-fund orders fall within the regulatory framework for fraudulent or unfair trade practices under securities law. The statutory bar on cognizance requires prosecution for offences under that framework to proceed on a complaint by SEBI, and the special mechanism prevails over general criminal-law process. An FIR founded essentially on the securities-law violation cannot bypass that requirement and was quashed in its existing form. Any criminal action for the alleged front-running offence must be initiated through SEBI&#039;s prescribed statutory procedure. Whether the facts disclose an independent general criminal-law offence remained undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>