<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1051 - GSTAT NEW DELHI-[PB]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797177</link>
    <description>GST rate reduction on cinema admission tickets had to be passed to recipients through a commensurate price reduction under the anti-profiteering provisions. Maintaining the existing cum-tax ticket price by increasing the base price defeated the tax benefit and breached that obligation. Regulatory fare limits, High Court permission to collect proposed fares, and representations to licensing authorities did not override the independent duty to reduce prices. Profiteering was computed by retaining the pre-reduction base price, applying the reduced GST rate, and measuring excess collections on actual ticket sales. The quantified benefit, with applicable interest, was directed to designated consumer welfare funds because recipients were unidentifiable; no penalty applied for the investigation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:35:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1051 - GSTAT NEW DELHI-[PB]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797177</link>
      <description>GST rate reduction on cinema admission tickets had to be passed to recipients through a commensurate price reduction under the anti-profiteering provisions. Maintaining the existing cum-tax ticket price by increasing the base price defeated the tax benefit and breached that obligation. Regulatory fare limits, High Court permission to collect proposed fares, and representations to licensing authorities did not override the independent duty to reduce prices. Profiteering was computed by retaining the pre-reduction base price, applying the reduced GST rate, and measuring excess collections on actual ticket sales. The quantified benefit, with applicable interest, was directed to designated consumer welfare funds because recipients were unidentifiable; no penalty applied for the investigation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>