<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470998</link>
    <description>Reassessment based on recorded reasons alleging undisclosed bogus long-term capital gains was invalid because the relevant share transactions produced short-term capital gains already disclosed in the original return. The factual premise for reopening was therefore incorrect. Reassessment at the originally returned income further showed that no income had escaped assessment. The reassessment order was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 22:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470998</link>
      <description>Reassessment based on recorded reasons alleging undisclosed bogus long-term capital gains was invalid because the relevant share transactions produced short-term capital gains already disclosed in the original return. The factual premise for reopening was therefore incorrect. Reassessment at the originally returned income further showed that no income had escaped assessment. The reassessment order was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>