<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2290 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470999</link>
    <description>Unsecured-loan additions cannot rest solely on non-production of lenders&#039; bank statements where lender identity and loan confirmations are established through PAN details and confirmations, without independent enquiry into the transactions. The addition was therefore deleted. For alleged bogus purchases in a civil-contract business, site-based procurement from local suppliers and operational urgency partly supported the transactions, but ledger discrepancies and some supplier denials justified an estimated disallowance. The purchase disallowance was restricted to 10% of the disputed amount, rather than disallowing the entire purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 22:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2290 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470999</link>
      <description>Unsecured-loan additions cannot rest solely on non-production of lenders&#039; bank statements where lender identity and loan confirmations are established through PAN details and confirmations, without independent enquiry into the transactions. The addition was therefore deleted. For alleged bogus purchases in a civil-contract business, site-based procurement from local suppliers and operational urgency partly supported the transactions, but ledger discrepancies and some supplier denials justified an estimated disallowance. The purchase disallowance was restricted to 10% of the disputed amount, rather than disallowing the entire purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>