<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 199 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing all appeals in favor of the appellants. It found no concrete evidence to prove the betel nuts were smuggled or of foreign origin, deeming the penalties and confiscation unjustified. The decision was based on suspicion rather than substantial proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 199 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing all appeals in favor of the appellants. It found no concrete evidence to prove the betel nuts were smuggled or of foreign origin, deeming the penalties and confiscation unjustified. The decision was based on suspicion rather than substantial proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>