<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1694 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470981</link>
    <description>Substantial questions of law were identified concerning the genuineness of a baggage receipt, the acceptance of retraction statements, and the validity of absolute confiscation of gold biscuits. The appeal was admitted for consideration of those questions and directed to be heard with a connected appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1694 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470981</link>
      <description>Substantial questions of law were identified concerning the genuineness of a baggage receipt, the acceptance of retraction statements, and the validity of absolute confiscation of gold biscuits. The appeal was admitted for consideration of those questions and directed to be heard with a connected appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>