<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CONFISCATION OF GOODS OR CONVEYANCE: NEVER BOTH UNDER SECTION 130</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17204</link>
    <description>Section 130 is analysed as permitting alternative confiscation of goods or conveyances, not routine confiscation of both. Goods-related contraventions and conveyance-related misuse require distinct factual foundations. Conveyance confiscation depends on an independent basis and is subject to the owner proving absence of knowledge or connivance. As confiscation permanently divests property, it should rest on cogent evidence of deliberate intent to evade tax, rather than technical defects or template allegations. Proposed responses include jurisdictional objections, proof of bona fide carriage, provisional release, and reliance on the redemption-fine limitation for hired conveyances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:43:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CONFISCATION OF GOODS OR CONVEYANCE: NEVER BOTH UNDER SECTION 130</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17204</link>
      <description>Section 130 is analysed as permitting alternative confiscation of goods or conveyances, not routine confiscation of both. Goods-related contraventions and conveyance-related misuse require distinct factual foundations. Conveyance confiscation depends on an independent basis and is subject to the owner proving absence of knowledge or connivance. As confiscation permanently divests property, it should rest on cogent evidence of deliberate intent to evade tax, rather than technical defects or template allegations. Proposed responses include jurisdictional objections, proof of bona fide carriage, provisional release, and reliance on the redemption-fine limitation for hired conveyances.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:43:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>