<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 957 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797083</link>
    <description>Transfer-pricing treatment of advertising, marketing and promotion expenditure requires evidence of an arrangement, understanding or concerted action with an associated enterprise; reimbursement alone does not establish an international transaction, and the Bright Line Test or intensity-based benchmarking cannot apply without one. Comparable selection and margin computation must reflect functional similarity, operational income and expenses, foreign-exchange gains linked to operations, working-capital effects and adjustments limited to associated-enterprise transactions. Royalty embedded in an already benchmarked licensed manufacturing segment should not be separately tested under CUP where comparables lack meaningful similarity, as this may duplicate adjustment. Distinct import and support-service transactions may be separately benchmarked where their functional, asset and risk profiles differ; Berry Ratio may be appropriate where goods costs are pass-through costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:38:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 957 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797083</link>
      <description>Transfer-pricing treatment of advertising, marketing and promotion expenditure requires evidence of an arrangement, understanding or concerted action with an associated enterprise; reimbursement alone does not establish an international transaction, and the Bright Line Test or intensity-based benchmarking cannot apply without one. Comparable selection and margin computation must reflect functional similarity, operational income and expenses, foreign-exchange gains linked to operations, working-capital effects and adjustments limited to associated-enterprise transactions. Royalty embedded in an already benchmarked licensed manufacturing segment should not be separately tested under CUP where comparables lack meaningful similarity, as this may duplicate adjustment. Distinct import and support-service transactions may be separately benchmarked where their functional, asset and risk profiles differ; Berry Ratio may be appropriate where goods costs are pass-through costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>