<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 201 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53249</link>
    <description>The Revenue successfully appealed against the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving a registered dealer&#039;s contravention of provisions related to scrap of brass and copper. The dealer was found to have discrepancies in their records and issued invoices for materials not physically dispatched, enabling them to claim credit. Despite the dealer&#039;s subsequent submission of corrected vehicle numbers, the court held that granting benefit based on this was erroneous. The judgment emphasized the lack of correspondence between duty paying documents and physical dispatch, leading to the department&#039;s appeal being allowed and the Commissioner (Appeals) order being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 201 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53249</link>
      <description>The Revenue successfully appealed against the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving a registered dealer&#039;s contravention of provisions related to scrap of brass and copper. The dealer was found to have discrepancies in their records and issued invoices for materials not physically dispatched, enabling them to claim credit. Despite the dealer&#039;s subsequent submission of corrected vehicle numbers, the court held that granting benefit based on this was erroneous. The judgment emphasized the lack of correspondence between duty paying documents and physical dispatch, leading to the department&#039;s appeal being allowed and the Commissioner (Appeals) order being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>