<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 972 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797098</link>
    <description>Bright Line Test is not a legally sanctioned method for determining transfer-pricing adjustments concerning advertising, marketing and promotion expenditure. Binding decisions support rejection of an adjustment computed through that test. The advertising, marketing and promotion adjustment was therefore rejected in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 972 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797098</link>
      <description>Bright Line Test is not a legally sanctioned method for determining transfer-pricing adjustments concerning advertising, marketing and promotion expenditure. Binding decisions support rejection of an adjustment computed through that test. The advertising, marketing and promotion adjustment was therefore rejected in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>