<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 975 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797101</link>
    <description>Availability of an effective statutory appeal before the Appellate Tribunal precluded writ intervention where the extended limitation period for that appeal remained open. The contention that the adjudication exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice was left for determination in the appellate process. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioners were left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 975 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797101</link>
      <description>Availability of an effective statutory appeal before the Appellate Tribunal precluded writ intervention where the extended limitation period for that appeal remained open. The contention that the adjudication exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice was left for determination in the appellate process. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioners were left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>