<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 976 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797102</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was not used to examine the jurisdictional challenge or validity of the assessment order because the statutory appellate remedy remained available. The petitioner received liberty to file the statutory appeal within two weeks, subject to the required pre-deposit and an application seeking condonation of delay. No determination was made on the merits of the assessment or the jurisdictional contention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 976 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797102</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was not used to examine the jurisdictional challenge or validity of the assessment order because the statutory appellate remedy remained available. The petitioner received liberty to file the statutory appeal within two weeks, subject to the required pre-deposit and an application seeking condonation of delay. No determination was made on the merits of the assessment or the jurisdictional contention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>