<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 982 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797108</link>
    <description>Contractual disputes concerning termination and forfeiture of security deposits, where an arbitration agreement applies, may be pursued through available commercial remedies rather than resolved in writ jurisdiction. Disbursement of an admitted amount may be sought without prejudice to those remedies, while the remaining dispute over termination and forfeiture proceeds through the applicable contractual mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:31:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 982 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797108</link>
      <description>Contractual disputes concerning termination and forfeiture of security deposits, where an arbitration agreement applies, may be pursued through available commercial remedies rather than resolved in writ jurisdiction. Disbursement of an admitted amount may be sought without prejudice to those remedies, while the remaining dispute over termination and forfeiture proceeds through the applicable contractual mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>