<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2273 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470967</link>
    <description>Bogus sales receipts could not be assessed in full as unexplained cash credits where the books were rejected and identical facts had previously justified profit estimation. Applying the accepted approach for the earlier year, income was to be computed at an 8% net-profit rate on gross receipts because no factual or legal distinction supported a departure. Only the estimated net profit was assessable, and the balance of the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2273 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470967</link>
      <description>Bogus sales receipts could not be assessed in full as unexplained cash credits where the books were rejected and identical facts had previously justified profit estimation. Applying the accepted approach for the earlier year, income was to be computed at an 8% net-profit rate on gross receipts because no factual or legal distinction supported a departure. Only the estimated net profit was assessable, and the balance of the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>