<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2277 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470971</link>
    <description>Unexplained-source addition for property payments cannot be sustained merely because earlier recorded bank withdrawals preceded the payments by a time gap. Where withdrawals are not shown to have been used for another purpose and the taxpayer also relies on business income and LIC maturity proceeds, the explanation requires consideration on the facts. Only a limited unexplained component remained assessable, while the balance addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2277 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470971</link>
      <description>Unexplained-source addition for property payments cannot be sustained merely because earlier recorded bank withdrawals preceded the payments by a time gap. Where withdrawals are not shown to have been used for another purpose and the taxpayer also relies on business income and LIC maturity proceeds, the explanation requires consideration on the facts. Only a limited unexplained component remained assessable, while the balance addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>