<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2162 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470957</link>
    <description>Recipients liable for service tax under reverse charge on goods transport agency services may claim abatement where the prescribed declaration is issued separately on the agency&#039;s letterhead. The applicable notifications did not mandate a particular format or require endorsement of the declaration on each consignment note. A separate certificate from the goods transport agency constituted sufficient compliance, preserving entitlement to abatement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 17:29:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2162 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470957</link>
      <description>Recipients liable for service tax under reverse charge on goods transport agency services may claim abatement where the prescribed declaration is issued separately on the agency&#039;s letterhead. The applicable notifications did not mandate a particular format or require endorsement of the declaration on each consignment note. A separate certificate from the goods transport agency constituted sufficient compliance, preserving entitlement to abatement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>