<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 1019 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470948</link>
    <description>An arbitration clause in an MOU held in escrow remains enforceable where the dispute concerns fulfilment of reciprocal escrow conditions and arbitral adjudication is not expressly or necessarily excluded. The clause is treated as separable from the underlying MOU, and written communications accepting its existence support its invocation. Pending arbitration, substantial payments under the MOU, undisputed execution, and requests to adjust payments may establish a prima facie case for preserving disputed land. Injunctive relief may restrain disposal, alienation, sale, or third-party rights, while disputes over escrow performance and payment character require arbitral evidence. Appointment of a Receiver is unnecessary where an injunction adequately protects the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 1019 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470948</link>
      <description>An arbitration clause in an MOU held in escrow remains enforceable where the dispute concerns fulfilment of reciprocal escrow conditions and arbitral adjudication is not expressly or necessarily excluded. The clause is treated as separable from the underlying MOU, and written communications accepting its existence support its invocation. Pending arbitration, substantial payments under the MOU, undisputed execution, and requests to adjust payments may establish a prima facie case for preserving disputed land. Injunctive relief may restrain disposal, alienation, sale, or third-party rights, while disputes over escrow performance and payment character require arbitral evidence. Appointment of a Receiver is unnecessary where an injunction adequately protects the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>